Rangers Fans Turn on €21k-Per-Week 2024 Signee After Dreadful 27-Minute Cameo: “Catastrophic Transfer Mistake”

Rangers supporters expected a strong performance after watching their team take an early lead, but by the time the first half ended at 1–1, the mood among the fans had shifted dramatically. Frustration poured across social media, fan forums, and the away end as Rangers struggled to maintain control after their bright start. While criticism was directed at several players, one figure took the brunt of the backlash: the club’s 2024 signee, earning a reported €21,000 per week, whose 27-minute cameo proved disastrous.

Rangers began the match with confidence, pressing aggressively, dictating possession, and quickly finding the opening goal. Supporters celebrated loudly, believing their team were finally settling into a rhythm after weeks of inconsistent performances. The early breakthrough heightened expectations, as many fans felt Rangers should dominate the rest of the match from that point onward.

But everything changed when Rangers lost concentration and conceded the equaliser. The shift was immediate. The errors, the sloppiness, and the loss of shape all fed into a growing frustration among the supporters who felt the match was slipping away unnecessarily.

The criticism wasn’t aimed at only one player far from it. Fans complained about misplaced passes, lack of intensity, and poor defensive coordination from several members of the squad. But the loudest, harshest, and most emotional reactions were directed toward the €21k-per-week signee, whose introduction only made things worse.

Expected to bring stability, leadership, and composure, he instead delivered a performance that incited disbelief. Within minutes of coming on, he looked off the pace. His positioning was poor, his decision-making slow, and his technical execution shaky. Every involvement seemed to create more problems rather than solutions.

Supporters who initially groaned at small errors quickly escalated to open frustration. By the time 27 minutes had passed, a large section of the fanbase had already labelled his cameo one of the worst individual spells of the season.

Social media erupted instantly.

One fan posted:

“This guy is on €21,000 a week and can’t put together five competent minutes. I’m actually finished.”

Another wrote:

“Whole squad is poor today but he’s something else. Worst signing we’ve made in years.”

A third comment gained hundreds of interactions:

“Catastrophic transfer mistake. I don’t care what anyone says he shouldn’t be anywhere near the starting lineup.”

Comment sections filled with phrases like “liability,” “unacceptable,” and “why is he even on the pitch?” The anger wasn’t mild it was fierce, emotional, and widespread. Many supporters even argued that playing him risked throwing the match away entirely.

Inside the stands, the reaction mirrored the online outrage. What had been a vibrant, confident energy following the opening goal dissolved into shouts of frustration. Fans debated loudly among themselves about substitutions, tactical decisions, and whether the coaching staff had misjudged the player’s readiness. Supporters who had previously defended him were suddenly calling for him to be removed from the pitch immediately.

Several players were under fire for contributing to the loss of momentum, but the fanbase consistently returned to the same target. To them, the €21k-per-week star wasn’t just having a poor half he was undermining the team’s ability to control the match.

The coaching staff appeared uneasy on the touchline, monitoring the situation closely. They had repeatedly backed the player in previous weeks, insisting he needed time to settle. But first half performance raised questions that even the manager would struggle to dismiss. It was clear that the player was lacking confidence, rhythm, and the sharpness required for a match of this intensity.

What amplified the backlash was the symbolism attached to his wages. Fans expect premium performances from premium earners. When those expectations are not met especially during a difficult match frustration turns quickly into resentment.

By half-time, the narrative was clear:

Yes, multiple Rangers players had underperformed.

Yes, the equaliser came from collective errors.

But the €21k-per-week signing was the face of the meltdown fair or not.

Supporters in the concourse debated his future at the club. Some insisted he shouldn’t play again until he “proves he deserves the shirt.” Others argued he had never shown enough quality to justify his contract in the first place. A few went as far as suggesting the club consider offloading him in the next transfer window.

As players walked off at the break, the frustration was undeniable. The tension among fans reflected deeper worries about the team’s consistency, mentality, and recruitment decisions.

Whether this 27-minute nightmare becomes a turning point in his career or a permanent stain remains to be seen. But for now, the €21k-per-week 2024 signee stands at the centre of one of the fiercest fan backlashes Rangers have faced this season.