Sam Allardyce Has no doubt on the ‘worst Manager In Football history right now’ Fans are going wild afterwards.

Sam Allardyce has ignited a fierce debate in Scottish football after delivering a withering verdict on  the worst manager right now in football, comments that have sparked an intense reaction among supporters and pundits alike.

Speaking during a wide-ranging discussion on a football podcast, the former England manager was asked about Celtic’s turbulent transition following Martin O’Neill’s brief but successful interim spell. Allardyce did not hold back, questioning Nancy’s early impact and suggesting the Frenchman’s opening weeks placed him among the poorest managerial starts the Scottish game has witnessed in recent times.

While Allardyce’s remarks were framed as opinion rather than formal judgement, the strength of his language ensured they travelled quickly across social media. Within hours, clips and quotes were circulating widely, prompting thousands of responses from Celtic supporters and rival

Nancy was appointed on a permanent basis after O’Neill guided Celtic through a short revival, winning seven of eight matches during a caretaker period that steadied the club after a difficult run. The board’s decision to move on swiftly, installing Nancy and committing to a new tactical direction, was met with mixed reaction at the time. That reaction has intensified following a challenging opening week for the new head coach.

Tactical changes implemented immediately by Nancy coincided with dropped points in crucial fixtures, leaving Celtic playing catch-up in domestic competitions. Although the Frenchman has since recorded his first win and received public backing from the club’s hierarchy, critics argue that the damage done early on cannot be ignored.

Allardyce’s comments tapped directly into that frustration. He contrasted Nancy’s uncertain start with O’Neill’s instant authority, pointing to what he described as clarity, simplicity and belief under the interim manager. While stopping short of calling for immediate change, Allardyce suggested that Celtic had abandoned stability too quickly.

Celtic supporters were split in their response. Some agreed with the former Bolton and Everton manager, arguing that Nancy’s early decisions lacked pragmatism and underestimated the unique pressures of managing in Glasgow. Others pushed back strongly, accusing Allardyce of exaggeration and insisting that Nancy deserves time to implement his ideas.

Online reaction was swift and emotional. Some fans described the comments as “brutal but honest”, while others labelled them “disrespectful” and “over the top”. Several pointed out that judging any manager so early into a tenure risks ignoring the longer-term vision that the board has committed to.

From within Celtic, there has been no official response to Allardyce’s remarks. Sources close to the club have reiterated that the hierarchy remain fully behind Nancy, viewing early turbulence as an inevitable part of transition rather than evidence of failure.

Players have also spoken positively about the new head coach in recent interviews, highlighting detailed training sessions and a clear tactical framework. Senior figures in the dressing room are said to be working closely with Nancy to smooth the adaptation period and restore consistency on the pitch.

Former players and analysts have urged caution. Several have noted that Scottish football history is littered with managers who struggled initially before finding success, particularly at clubs with the scale and scrutiny of Celtic. They argue that Allardyce’s comments, while attention-grabbing, reflect the heightened emotions surrounding the club rather than a definitive assessment of Nancy’s ability.

The shadow of Martin O’Neill looms large over the discussion. His dramatic return, highlighted by wins over Rangers, a late Callum McGregor goal at St Mirren and a memorable European night in Rotterdam, has created a direct comparison that any successor would struggle to escape. For some supporters, O’Neill’s short spell felt like proof that the solution was already in place.

Nancy now faces the challenge of shifting the narrative. Results in the coming weeks are likely to dictate whether Allardyce’s comments fade into the background or become a rallying cry for further criticism. Victory has eased some pressure, but performances remain under close examination.

For now, Allardyce’s intervention has added fuel to an already volatile conversation. Whether his judgement proves prophetic or premature will be decided on the pitch, but his words have ensured that Wilfried Nancy’s tenure at Celtic will continue to be debated with unusual intensity.